Doubts raised about murderer-politician’s trial

You thought Bolsavikland was strange. Down Under, they even have a Vietnamese-Australian politician jailed for life, for the killing of a member of state parliament.

Apparently, though, after 10 years in prison, the man has won the sympathy of some in local media. The ABC (A for Australian) TV program Four Corners on April 7 raised doubts about the quality of evidence in the case of former city councillor from Fairfield, New South Wales, Phuong Ngo (Vietnamese: Ngô C?nh Ph??ng, photo, from here).

OK so he’s not Vietnamese-American, but he’s still part of the Vietnamese diaspora, so the Bolsavik thinks he should get an entry, given the notoriety of his case.

Ngo has been in jail for 10 years for ordering the 1994 murder of Australian state MP John Newman. It took three trials to convict him; the first two resulting in one aborted trial and one hung jury.

A friend of Newman and former Fairfield mayor Ken Chapman explained, as quoted by the Fairfield Champion newspaper here:

“I firmly believe Ngo did it, and it was political, but it wasn’t because Ngo wanted Newman’s seat. Newman had passed information about Ngo’s dealings at the Mekong Club to ICAC, which showed how deep Ngo’s hands had been in the club’s pockets.”

According to the Four Corners program, as told by the Fairfield Advance here, “a total of 10 witnesses were offered indemnity (Ozziespeak for “immunity”) against prosecution if they gave evidence against Phuong Ngo.”

The program said that two men known only as “Tony” and “John” agreed to change their testimony and pointed fingers at Ngo after investigators allegedly offered them “overseas protection, money and indemnity against prosecution.”

A current Vietnamese-Australian Fairfield councillor, Dennis Huynh, thought that the case should be re-opened.

In a followup, ABC announced here: ”New South Wales Attorney-General John Hatzistergos says he will consider reviewing the conviction of the man jailed over the 1994 murder of the state MP John Newman, but says reviews are only granted in exceptional circumstances.”

Chapman, for one, remained unconvinced. He said, “Most of the evidence in the program has been tested before and settled, so I was a bit surprised to see it come up again but nothing has changed.”

This entry was posted in crime and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Doubts raised about murderer-politician’s trial

  1. Hong Ha says:

    Mr. Newsome was arrogant and racist in his remark.
    He had a lot of enemies.
    He was also careless and thought that he was invincible.

    NSW Police is incompetent.
    Mr. Phuong is innocent.

    I do not like the way he made his wealth from the Mekong club.
    He is not a community builder but he definitely was NOT the killer.

    There are a lot of cowards in the Vietnamese community.
    They should have marched and protesting his imprisonment.

    Please release him.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>