Did Hoa or did Hoa not pay BC Communication?
May 21st, 2008Jubal at OC Blog/Red County pointed this out in his post here examining Hoa Van Tran’s amended financial disclosure:
Back in March, when Hoa filed his initial financial disclosure, signed by his treasurer Phu Do Nguyen, it lists only three items of expenditure, one of which was a $750 payment to “BC Communication” and marked as OFC (”Office Expenses”). See PDF here, page 11.
In the amended disclosure, PDF here pages 12-16, there’s no listing of that payment.
So, assuming the amended disclosure is correct, how did the payment to BC Communication make it to the first one?
Really, you list only 3 payments and you manage to include some payment you didn’t make? In other words: 33% of the payments you listed are payments you didn’t make?
To err is human, to grossly err is still human, but also weird.
May 21st, 2008 at 1:30 pm
Bolsavik,
Does Jubal’s post contain an error? From a link to another post, he seems to think Phu Do Nguyen (the lawyer) is Phu Nguyen (of Hoa Phat). Man, it’s hard to keep these guys straight!
May 21st, 2008 at 3:57 pm
Yes VietPundit, Jubal seems to think that anh Do Phu is me. I’m the dark sith……even though I’ve disappeared from the community the last year or so.
Thanks Mr. BoNsaVick. You’re doing a great job.
May 21st, 2008 at 7:18 pm
Hi VietPundit,
It doesn’t matter if Jubal’s post contains any error. You can check the PDF yourself. Each page only contains 3 lines of expenditures….
May 21st, 2008 at 9:18 pm
Bolsavik,
I wasn’t making excuses for the Hoa’s campaign; I agree with you about its gross incompetence. Actually, that campaign has been a good laugh, hasn’t it? I just thought it was funny that Jubal got the two Phu’s confused, that’s all.
May 21st, 2008 at 11:28 pm
If Hoa Tran could not handle this simple task how could he handle OC daily business. There is no excuse since he is an attorney.