Sorry for the interruption folks. It’s Finals’ week, and in the grand scheme of things, students come before blogs.
Now, new rule on comments: Abusive comments will be deleted. But there’s no guarantee that all abusive comments will be caught, and other people’s definition of abusive may not jive with the owner of this blog’s definition.
Is that unfair? No it’s not. But if you disagree, there’s nothing you can do about it because, let’s face it, this is a blog, not the Congress of the United States.
Catch-up entries coming up next.
my friend the bolsavik thats a great idea i know i have been guilty of that myself but thats a good idea. i also think when a person fires off 10/15 idiotic posts in a row they should be deleted as well.
Good, its so freaking ridiculous when the comments section is taken over by bickering between people who have way too much time on their hands.
@ xu:
how’s the WSJ blog coming along? Vacant as usual? Coming back to fill your time like the other countless failed blogs? Hahaha.
@alvarez:
its not a blog idiot. its a group forum besides all the Vietnam group forums on wsj are dead as shit.
btw, if all the dumb bickering were deleted from this blog, it would be dead also.
@xu:
that’s exactly my point…you judge others regarding their worthless bickering, and you use this blog to further your own forum and agenda. now, you call me names to emphasize your point of people bickering and name calling on Bolsavik.
you should give yourself a better name handle…try “Clueless and Tactless”.
@jose:
your posts have no point, they never do.
@xu:
how do you plan to involve anyone in a conversation if you do not intend to engage the other party in a sincere manner? which part of my point do you not understand? or is it that you cannot face your own limitation and using another excuse to deflect my line of questioning?
why start any endeavor that exceeds your capacity?
@jose:
huh? that makes no sense.
I am glad you’re gonna do something about this, Bolsavik! Thanx a bunch!
I can safely say that xu is not a match for alvarez, xu was using language of a street thug while alvarez was taking high road.
By the way, Bolsavik get well soon!
@jose:
huh? u make no sense what so ever.
Posts had been deleted. Not new rules!
@Jose:
Don’t be humble, you are the king of idiotic posts. Your posts are vulgar (i.e. Art Pedroza).
This is all Viet, all the time. Bring your stray dog instinct to improve the numbers in your community.
@alvarez:
I do enjoy WSJ forum!
It’s always refreshing to know you are one of those with such a positive thinking (exceed capacity?)
I guess Lou Dobb is right.
@N:
How do you know Bolsavik needs to get well?
Did Bolsavik pay you? Close friend? In relationship?
You preach the high road, but I haven’t seen that in many of your posts …
Maybe you need to get well too?
Bolsavik woke up finally at 9:12pm and put a stop to those nonsense comments.
Thank you.
there was over 1300 responses on that post and jung kim had about 900. it’s too bad that somebody like him/her controls this blog just by the volume of posts he has on here. lame posts at that. he/she either needs to be controlled or needs to get a job.
Thank you again.