<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bolsavik.com &#187; National Geographic Society</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bolsavik.com/tag/national-geographic-society/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bolsavik.com</link>
	<description>All Viet, all the time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 11:10:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Viets&#8217; petition succeeds, National Geographic will change Paracels map</title>
		<link>http://bolsavik.com/2010/03/viets-petition-succeeds-national-geographic-will-change-paracels-map/</link>
		<comments>http://bolsavik.com/2010/03/viets-petition-succeeds-national-geographic-will-change-paracels-map/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 07:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bolsavik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Geographic Society]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bolsavik.com/?p=2252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[National Geographic Society on Wednesday said that it would change the designation &#8220;China&#8221; on the Paracel Islands, after the Viet group Nguyen Thai Hoc Foundation protested it and started an online petition signed by more than 8100 people worldwide in &#8230; <a href="http://bolsavik.com/2010/03/viets-petition-succeeds-national-geographic-will-change-paracels-map/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2719/4440408412_173e02964c.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>National Geographic Society on Wednesday said that it would change the designation &#8220;China&#8221; on the Paracel Islands, after the Viet group <strong>Nguyen Thai Hoc Foundation</strong> protested it and started an online petition signed by more than 8100 people worldwide in a matter of just days.</p>
<p>The issue is National Geographic&#8217;s World Political Map, to the left above. It&#8217;s online <a href="http://www.natgeomaps.com/world_decorator_zoomify.html?zoomifyImagePath=assets/files/zoomify/re00622077/re00622077_1_img&amp;zoomifyNavigatorVisible=false" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>The map labels the Paracels with its Chinese name and annotates in red, &#8220;China.&#8221;</p>
<p>That did not sit well with red blooded Vietnamese, who had held the island until 1974 when the Chinese navy overran the Vietnamese garrison there and took the islands.</p>
<p>The group Nguyen Thai Hoc Foundation started an <a href="http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/ParacelIslands" target="_blank">online petition</a> calling for the removal of the &#8220;China&#8221; label. The petition was started on March 11 and by March 16 it already had 8100+ signatures.</p>
<p>The Bolsavik contacted the National Geographic Society during the weekend for Nguoi Viet Daily News, and on Monday its spokesperson, Communications Manager <strong>Cindy Beidel</strong> acknowledged that the society was aware of the petition and that it would respond soon &#8211; which it then did the next day.</p>
<p><span id="more-2252"></span><img style="float: left; border: 1px solid black; margin-top: 2px; margin-bottom: 2px; margin-left: 2px; margin-right: 9px;" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2763/4439680819_6441871511_o.jpg" alt="" />Interestingly, on a different map, <a href="http://www.natgeomaps.com/asia_zoomify.html?zoomifyImagePath=assets/files/zoomify/re00602812/re00602812_1_img&amp;zoomifyNavigatorVisible=false" target="_blank">that of Asia</a>, the National Geographic Society had a different legend. On there, the label says: &#8220;Administered by China (claimed by Vietnam).&#8221;</p>
<p>Ms. Beidel explained that the map of Asia is &#8220;a different map at a different scale, which allows for greater detail.&#8221;</p>
<p>On Tuesday, National Geographic issued a <a href="http://press.nationalgeographic.com/pressroom/index.jsp?pageID=pressReleases_detail&amp;siteID=1&amp;cid=1268771677039" target="_blank">press release</a>, explaining that the label currently used is apolitical and merely reflects the de facto reality on the ground.</p>
<p>Nonetheless, National Geographic acknowledged that &#8220;<span>simply denoting the archipelago with the Chinese name and the word &#8216;China&#8217; in parenthesis without further explanation can be misleading and misinterpreted.&#8221;</span></p>
<p>As a result, the society said that it would &#8220;either provide the additional explanation that is included on our other maps as described above, or … will omit any designation.&#8221;</p>
<p>In other words, in future editions &#8211; which may be a year or more away &#8211; the islands will no longer be labeled just &#8220;China.&#8221;</p>
<p><span style="color: #ffffff;">.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #ffffff;">.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #999999;">(By the way, remember the strange woman who threw a fit at the Westminster Vietnam War Memorial, <a title="Whoomp! There she is! Strange woman strikes again" href="http://bolsavik.com/2010/01/whoomp-there-she-is/" target="_blank">here</a>? It was at the commemoration of the 1974 battle over those islands.)</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bolsavik.com/2010/03/viets-petition-succeeds-national-geographic-will-change-paracels-map/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

